[Closed] SLOWER than qTranslate

Home Support English Support [Closed] SLOWER than qTranslate

This topic contains 9 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  ZE’EV 1 year, 1 month ago. The support staff assigned to this topic is Mihai.

Author Posts
Author Posts
June 12, 2013 at 5:10 pm #135319

ZE’EV

One of the main reasons I wanted to switch to WPML was that you said it would be faster than qTranslate.

I ran the "P3 Plugin Profiler" on 2 installations, 1 with WPML, and 1 with qTranslate.
Based on this, WPML is much slower.

For the same browsing session,
WPML consumed 79% of load time, generated 411 queries, and used 0.75 seconds.
qT was only 37%, 60 queries, and 0.14 seconds.

Is this normal?

Results:

WPML:

WordPress Plugin Profile Report
===========================================
Report date: 2013/06/11
Theme name: Pilcrow
Pages browsed: 4
Avg. load time: 1.0404 sec
Number of plugins: 19
Plugin impact: 92.11% of load time
Avg. plugin time: 0.9583 sec
Avg. core time: 0.0432 sec
Avg. theme time: 0.0124 sec
Avg. mem usage: 42.94 MB
Avg. ticks: 25,582
Avg. db queries : 410.50
Margin of error : 0.0264 sec

Plugin list:
===========================================
P3 (Plugin Performance Profiler) – 0.0014 sec – 0.14%
Addthis – 0.0063 sec – 0.65%
Akismet – 0.0015 sec – 0.16%
Batch Cat – 0.0010 sec – 0.11%
Configurable Tag Cloud Widget – 0.0015 sec – 0.16%
Drop Cap Shortcode – 0.0023 sec – 0.24%
Google Analyticator – 0.0042 sec – 0.44%
Imsanity – 0.0098 sec – 1.03%
Jetpack by WordPress.com – 0.1178 sec – 12.30%
List Category Posts – 0.0144 sec – 1.50%
My Category Order – 0.0030 sec – 0.31%
My Link Order – 0.0010 sec – 0.10%
outbrain – 0.0018 sec – 0.18%
Rss Image Feed – 0.0005 sec – 0.05%
Sitepress Multilingual Cms – 0.7574 sec – 79.03%
Smart Youtube – 0.0102 sec – 1.07%
WP-RTL – 0.0079 sec – 0.82%
Wp Super Cache – 0.0047 sec – 0.49%
WPtouch – 0.0117 sec – 1.22%

qTranslate:

WordPress Plugin Profile Report
===========================================
Report date: 2013/06/11
Theme name: Pilcrow
Pages browsed: 10
Avg. load time: 0.4233 sec
Number of plugins: 19
Plugin impact: 89.56% of load time
Avg. plugin time: 0.3791 sec
Avg. core time: 0.0300 sec
Avg. theme time: 0.0052 sec
Avg. mem usage: 36.03 MB
Avg. ticks: 18,969
Avg. db queries : 60.60
Margin of error : 0.0090 sec

Plugin list:
===========================================
P3 (Plugin Performance Profiler) – 0.0023 sec – 0.60%
Addthis – 0.0064 sec – 1.68%
Akismet – 0.0018 sec – 0.48%
Batch Cat – 0.0010 sec – 0.26%
Configurable Tag Cloud Widget – 0.0015 sec – 0.39%
Drop Cap Shortcode – 0.0021 sec – 0.54%
Google Analyticator – 0.0038 sec – 1.01%
Imsanity – 0.0098 sec – 2.58%
Jetpack by WordPress.com – 0.1561 sec – 41.16%
List Category Posts – 0.0112 sec – 2.96%
My Category Order – 0.0034 sec – 0.91%
My Link Order – 0.0008 sec – 0.22%
outbrain – 0.0009 sec – 0.23%
qTranslate – 0.1400 sec – 36.92%
Rss Image Feed – 0.0045 sec – 1.18%
Smart Youtube – 0.0050 sec – 1.32%
WP-RTL – 0.0097 sec – 2.56%
Wp Super Cache – 0.0087 sec – 2.29%
WPtouch – 0.0103 sec – 2.72%

June 13, 2013 at 7:37 am #135424

andreas.n
Forum moderator

Hello Ze'ev,

Thank you very much for this information!
Is it the same website you've send me credentials for End of May?

June 13, 2013 at 6:21 pm #135712

ZE’EV

No, it's on a different host now. I can send you login by email.

June 14, 2013 at 12:18 pm #135882

Bigul
Forum moderator

Dear Ze'ev,

Please let me know you are using same Server or not for both installations.


With Regards

Bigul

June 14, 2013 at 4:29 pm #135978

ZE’EV

Yes, same server, same host, same pages browsed.

June 17, 2013 at 12:10 am #136374

ZE’EV

Any progress?

June 17, 2013 at 12:04 pm #136535

andreas.n
Forum moderator

Hello Ze'ev,

Unfortunately not yet – we are still running some tests.
For the meanwhile I personally would recommend the steps mentioned here: http://wpml.org/2012/01/can-your-site-run-faster/

Thank you for your patience!

June 17, 2013 at 2:54 pm #136607

Mihai
Forum moderator

Ze'ev,

Just an update on this: we're currently also working on the new WPML release (2.9) so we're directing most of the efforts there. But in the next few weeks, also based on the our testing results , we plan to work on this and make WPML faster in more situations.

Your report helps (just like other reports we had in the past) because it can highlight a situation that we might not have considered.

We'll keep you updated and let you know when we have something that you can test.

Thanks,
Mihai

June 17, 2013 at 5:12 pm #136646

ZE’EV

Re – http://wpml.org/2012/01/can-your-site-run-faster/ – I don't think any of that is germane to WPML, that's just generic optimization tips. Anything I did would speed up qTranslate as well.

July 2, 2013 at 12:17 am #140624

ZE’EV

Anything new?

It's been nearly 3 months since I bought WPML, with the promise that it would perform better than qTranslate, when in fact it's far slower.

The topic ‘[Closed] SLOWER than qTranslate’ is closed to new replies.