Due to the large volume of support requests you may experience longer wait until a supporter handles your request. We apologize for the inconvenience this causes. We encourage you to please search the forum for other support topics that may be helpful and to review our documentation. A supporter will respond to you as soon as possible.

[Closed] SLOWER than qTranslate

Home Support English Support [Closed] SLOWER than qTranslate

This topic contains 9 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  ZE’EV 1 year, 8 months ago. The support staff assigned to this topic is Mihai.

Author Posts
Author Posts
June 12, 2013 at 5:10 pm #135319

ZE’EV

One of the main reasons I wanted to switch to WPML was that you said it would be faster than qTranslate.

I ran the "P3 Plugin Profiler" on 2 installations, 1 with WPML, and 1 with qTranslate.
Based on this, WPML is much slower.

For the same browsing session,
WPML consumed 79% of load time, generated 411 queries, and used 0.75 seconds.
qT was only 37%, 60 queries, and 0.14 seconds.

Is this normal?

Results:

WPML:

WordPress Plugin Profile Report
===========================================
Report date: 2013/06/11
Theme name: Pilcrow
Pages browsed: 4
Avg. load time: 1.0404 sec
Number of plugins: 19
Plugin impact: 92.11% of load time
Avg. plugin time: 0.9583 sec
Avg. core time: 0.0432 sec
Avg. theme time: 0.0124 sec
Avg. mem usage: 42.94 MB
Avg. ticks: 25,582
Avg. db queries : 410.50
Margin of error : 0.0264 sec

Plugin list:
===========================================
P3 (Plugin Performance Profiler) – 0.0014 sec – 0.14%
Addthis – 0.0063 sec – 0.65%
Akismet – 0.0015 sec – 0.16%
Batch Cat – 0.0010 sec – 0.11%
Configurable Tag Cloud Widget – 0.0015 sec – 0.16%
Drop Cap Shortcode – 0.0023 sec – 0.24%
Google Analyticator – 0.0042 sec – 0.44%
Imsanity – 0.0098 sec – 1.03%
Jetpack by WordPress.com – 0.1178 sec – 12.30%
List Category Posts – 0.0144 sec – 1.50%
My Category Order – 0.0030 sec – 0.31%
My Link Order – 0.0010 sec – 0.10%
outbrain – 0.0018 sec – 0.18%
Rss Image Feed – 0.0005 sec – 0.05%
Sitepress Multilingual Cms – 0.7574 sec – 79.03%
Smart Youtube – 0.0102 sec – 1.07%
WP-RTL – 0.0079 sec – 0.82%
Wp Super Cache – 0.0047 sec – 0.49%
WPtouch – 0.0117 sec – 1.22%

qTranslate:

WordPress Plugin Profile Report
===========================================
Report date: 2013/06/11
Theme name: Pilcrow
Pages browsed: 10
Avg. load time: 0.4233 sec
Number of plugins: 19
Plugin impact: 89.56% of load time
Avg. plugin time: 0.3791 sec
Avg. core time: 0.0300 sec
Avg. theme time: 0.0052 sec
Avg. mem usage: 36.03 MB
Avg. ticks: 18,969
Avg. db queries : 60.60
Margin of error : 0.0090 sec

Plugin list:
===========================================
P3 (Plugin Performance Profiler) – 0.0023 sec – 0.60%
Addthis – 0.0064 sec – 1.68%
Akismet – 0.0018 sec – 0.48%
Batch Cat – 0.0010 sec – 0.26%
Configurable Tag Cloud Widget – 0.0015 sec – 0.39%
Drop Cap Shortcode – 0.0021 sec – 0.54%
Google Analyticator – 0.0038 sec – 1.01%
Imsanity – 0.0098 sec – 2.58%
Jetpack by WordPress.com – 0.1561 sec – 41.16%
List Category Posts – 0.0112 sec – 2.96%
My Category Order – 0.0034 sec – 0.91%
My Link Order – 0.0008 sec – 0.22%
outbrain – 0.0009 sec – 0.23%
qTranslate – 0.1400 sec – 36.92%
Rss Image Feed – 0.0045 sec – 1.18%
Smart Youtube – 0.0050 sec – 1.32%
WP-RTL – 0.0097 sec – 2.56%
Wp Super Cache – 0.0087 sec – 2.29%
WPtouch – 0.0103 sec – 2.72%

June 13, 2013 at 7:37 am #135424

andreas.n
Forum moderator

Hello Ze'ev,

Thank you very much for this information!
Is it the same website you've send me credentials for End of May?

June 13, 2013 at 6:21 pm #135712

ZE’EV

No, it's on a different host now. I can send you login by email.

June 14, 2013 at 12:18 pm #135882

Bigul
Forum moderator

Dear Ze'ev,

Please let me know you are using same Server or not for both installations.

--
With Regards

Bigul

June 14, 2013 at 4:29 pm #135978

ZE’EV

Yes, same server, same host, same pages browsed.

June 17, 2013 at 12:10 am #136374

ZE’EV

Any progress?

June 17, 2013 at 12:04 pm #136535

andreas.n
Forum moderator

Hello Ze'ev,

Unfortunately not yet - we are still running some tests.
For the meanwhile I personally would recommend the steps mentioned here: http://wpml.org/2012/01/can-your-site-run-faster/

Thank you for your patience!

June 17, 2013 at 2:54 pm #136607

Mihai
Forum moderator

Ze'ev,

Just an update on this: we're currently also working on the new WPML release (2.9) so we're directing most of the efforts there. But in the next few weeks, also based on the our testing results , we plan to work on this and make WPML faster in more situations.

Your report helps (just like other reports we had in the past) because it can highlight a situation that we might not have considered.

We'll keep you updated and let you know when we have something that you can test.

Thanks,
Mihai

June 17, 2013 at 5:12 pm #136646

ZE’EV

Re - http://wpml.org/2012/01/can-your-site-run-faster/ - I don't think any of that is germane to WPML, that's just generic optimization tips. Anything I did would speed up qTranslate as well.

July 2, 2013 at 12:17 am #140624

ZE’EV

Anything new?

It's been nearly 3 months since I bought WPML, with the promise that it would perform better than qTranslate, when in fact it's far slower.

The topic ‘[Closed] SLOWER than qTranslate’ is closed to new replies.